Showing posts with label Alberta Progressive Conservatives. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alberta Progressive Conservatives. Show all posts

Monday, 6 June 2011

Sand in the Shorts: Time for the Sun to Set on Federal Transfers

The time has come for the federal government to let the provinces know that transfer payment growth has seen it's day. In bringing down the new(ish) budget today, the main areas of restraint can be found in the gradual elimination of the vote subsidy and the promise to find savings totaling $11 billion over the next four years within Ottawa's $80 billion operating budget. This will allow the deficit to be eliminated by fiscal 2014-15.

That's nice. But it just scratches the surface when it comes to reigning in runaway growth in provincial transfers in order to be prepared for increased healthcare spending as Canada's population ages. As it stands, the next five years will see the national debt stop growing and even shrink, ever so slightly. But if our current fiscal health is to last through the next 50 years, there needs to be much more done.

Right now the provincial governments as a whole are tending to spend like drunken sailors, with Ontario's massive $14 billion deficit merely leading the way. The problem is that even this level is reliant upon massive federal transfers. Partly this is a result of the muddled way of funding programs which has grown in Canada over the last 50 years. It is also partly a result of the system of transfer payments which were initially meant to balance services, but instead now allow Canadians in Ontario, BC and Alberta to subsidize superior levels of service in PEI, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia.

These transfers, and the confused means of federal funding for provincial responsibilities, represent the single biggest drag on federal spending – and the single biggest excuse used by provincial governments to disguise their fiscal incompetence. The McGuinty government in Ontario gives massive pay raises to government employees, along with a $7 billion gift to Samsung which will supposedly bring all kinds of wind-power equipment manufacturing to Ontario – if the stars, planets, and galaxies align, the Maple Leafs win the Cup, and Ontarians are lucky beyond belief. Then it passes a budget with a projected deficit in the coming year of $11 billion. Why? “The federal government...”

Alberta has been doing the same, ignoring it's own mismanagement of oil revenues, abortive royalty increases in the oil patch, and out of control spending. Instead the blame is laid on Ottawa. The same can be seen in provincial capitals across the country.

The means to fix this system is fairly simple, though. It starts with the Ottawa getting out of funding programs such as health and education which are a provincial responsibility, and transferring the tax points which formerly funded these to the various provincial governments. The transfer payment system should be abandoned and replaced by a new one which covers just the most basic services, with adjustments being made to reflect relative cost of living and differences in costs to the governments of providing equivalent services.

For example, if the cost of hiring a nurse in New Brunswick is only 95% of the cost in Ontario, the transfers should be adjusted to reflect that. Right now it isn't, and as a result, the level of service found in a Charlottetown hospital is far superior to that in a Belleville hospital. A dollar simply goes further in some parts of the country.

The net effect of this would be to make clear to the voter precisely which level of government is wasting their tax dollars in a given area, and thus allow Canadians to vote accordingly. It would also mean the end of Ontario, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland, Alberta and BC subsidizing Quebec's grossly over-subsidized nanny state and general fiscal mismanagement.

And if we fix this system soon, maybe we'll be able to nurse our healthcare system through the next 50 years.

Wednesday, 25 May 2011

National Post editorial board: Ottawa isn’t the oil sands’ enemy, Edmonton is | Full Comment | National Post

by the National Post Editorial Board - from the National Post

There’s an old adage in Alberta politics that when all else fails, bash Ottawa. Well, Alberta’s Tory government must feel itself at risk of failure, because it has begun making far-fetched claims about how its federal cousins ­­— Stephen Harper’s new Tory majority — have suddenly turned into anti-oil sands hypocrites bent on hobbling the project’s development with new environmental regulations just to win favour with central Canadian voters.

“The federal government has sat on the sidelines for years and years and years. Now they see their little golden goose is under attack and they want to be the voice for Canada on the world stage and we respect that,” Alberta Finance Minister Lloyd Snelgrove told Postmedia News this week. “We have tried to be team players on this. They’re saying Alberta should have been all over the world defending the oil sands, but only as long as they are holding the leash.”

These claims are overwrought. The Canadian government has rightly defended the oil patch on the world stage. And to the extent that excessive regulation might hobble the oil sands, it is Ed Stelmach’s government in Alberta that poses the greatest risk.

In the past, it is true that Alberta has had every right to be wary of federal intervention. Pierre Trudeau famously imposed his National Energy Program (NEP) on the resource-rich province, and in just over six years drained more than $70-billion out of its economy and sent the province into an economic tailspin that took 10 years to pull out of. At present, Alberta still annually contributes over $5,000 more toward Confederation than its residents receive in return for every man, woman and child in the province.

Even former Tory prime minister Brian Mulroney became unpopular in Alberta for failing to end the NEP for 2½ years after assuming office, for foisting the GST on a province that had previously had no sales tax, and for attempting to amend the Constitution in such a way that would have appeased many of Quebec’s concerns, while also giving Quebec a veto over future change requested by other provinces.

But the current Alberta government has nothing similar to gripe about. It’s true that after being reappointed federal Environment Minister last week, Toronto MP Peter Kent announced Ottawa would soon introduce environmental regulations that would reduce the oil sands’ carbon footprint. But it is unlikely these regulations will devastate Alberta’s economy. This is the same federal government that in its first term proposed ignoring the UN’s Kyoto accords in favour of more sensible quotas that tied growth in carbon dioxide emission to growth in the economy. Moreover, the same week as he let it be known that oil sands regulations are pending, Mr. Kent also announced that a cap-and-trade scheme to cut carbon emissions was “off the table,” a very pro-oil sands move.

Indeed, in the past five years, the Alberta government under Premier Stelmach has done more to discourage oil sands development than anything done or proposed by the Harper Tories.


National Post editorial board: Ottawa isn’t the oil sands’ enemy, Edmonton is | Full Comment | National Post