Tuesday, 12 October 2010

My Twitter Coverage of the Mayoralty Candidates debate - Oct 12, 2010, from Loyalist College

  1. any questions - thanks for following tonight
  2. Such excitement - blow after blow - or not - but the Longhurst follies provided entertainment. Thanks for following. Feel free to tweet
  3. Ellis slams Panciuk to close debate!
  4. Longhurst: "I paid my $200" - Thurlow gets shafted - has since amalgamation - he's off to his own personal special place
  5. Panciuk: there is a guy w/ a 'ditch mitch for mayor' shirt - 'my own personal protester' - "join me and build a better Belleville"
  6. Closing
  7. Herrington: we have a good police force - Neighbourhood watch is for communities to organize
  8. Longhurst: never really thought of it
  9. Ellis: looking at using tech to aid in Neighbourhood watch using Teksavvy
  10. Panciuk: would support that
  11. Question - in light of violence of last year, any thoughts of increasing Neighbourhood Watch
  12. Longhurst: all for it
  13. Harrington: paved shoulders and trails
  14. Ellis: working to extend pathway for cycles, walking to Loyalist from Bridge W
  15. Question: in 4 years will there be a green way to commute to Loyalist
  16. Longhurst: checked with Ellis if it's Belleville or Quinte West - Ellis said QW - but they continue to answer - Hamilton Rd is in QW!
  17. Q: will there ever be lights at Hamilton and Wallbridge-Loyalist Rd
  18. Longhurst - all for it
  19. Ellis and Panciuk support, as does Harrington
  20. Question: transit passes as part of Loyalist tuition
  21. Longhurst- I'm a union man and won't take away union jobs
  22. Harrington - supports 907 continued work
  23. Ellis tried to rebut - wasn't allowed
  24. Panciuk: supports city owned facilities but concerned about increasing costs. Just attacked Ellis! Ellis "came clean" on some monetary info
  25. Ellis: no plans for any privatization
  26. Question - will Local 907 continue to operate arenas?
  27. LLLLLLLonghurst! - "never voted for a sign in my life", etc - and he's out of there!
  28. sign business owners
  29. Harrington - city makes money off sign permits - communities need to speak up regarding signs in community - sign business just sideline for
  30. when they are just starting - mentioned Smitty's plethora of signs - people are more concerned about # of political signs
  31. Panciuk: need to distinguish between quality of signs - some are better than others - concerned about impact on businesses - especially
  32. sign business owners, will take time
  33. Ellis - signs are ugly and all over the place - how can we get rid of them in a fair way - council has had tough decisions, consider
  34. Question: concerned about signs along streets -
  35. Ellis: city funds Pinnacle Playhouse, rebuilding bandshell @ Zwicks Island, council funds Quinte Arts Council, Festival of Trees, ballet
  36. Panciuk: we have an art scene that rivals some much larger centres, can foster arts with events in the summer
  37. Harrington ; arts about more than just painters, etc - should have support from city - good from tourism
  38. Longhurst supports arts - an art gallery would cost money, but apparently we don't have any
  39. sorry, am I becoming sarcastic?
  40. Longstache, er Longhurst: will believe it when he sees it.
  41. Local entity there if Baymount can't fulfill contract
  42. Ellis - city doesn't control Ag Society, who have the contract with Baymount - new ownership of Baymount - looks to be moving forward
  43. But he is working the 'stache!
  44. Is Longhurst more like Oscar the Grouch, or Elmo?
  45. Panciuk and Ellis just co-operated - Grover would be proud!
  46. Racetrack question: -Panciuk: Baymount having extreme financial difficulty (ya think?!)
  47. Ellis is addressing the question of transit. need to teach children about transit, get them and their parents used to it - ridership up
  48. Longhurstland is open for business! I want what HE's having!
  49. IT'S LONGHURST TIME! Twice a day - audience is telling him it didn't work - where is 'downtown foxboro'? as opposed to just foxboro
  50. rain causes treatment plant to bypass - need to separate systems, so storm drains dont link to sewers - part of roads reconstruction plan
  51. Ellis: remedial action plan almost completed, Meyers Pier rehab - need to work to eliminate waste being flushed into the bay when heavy
  52. Longhurst: need to work with senior governments and conservation areas
  53. Herrington: agrees with Panciuk - need to work with other municipalities, Quinte Conservation, "need to work together"
  54. Panciuk: enforce regs - doesn't believe city is further damaging bay - a lot of what is in the bay comes from other places
  55. question: what would candidates do regarding bay of quinte
  56. Ellis: "we were handed a mess", had to give back superbuild money (5 million)
  57. most spending courtesy of transfers from senior governments
  58. Ellis: goes over what the city has done: it is handy to have accomplishments to fall back on - for better or worse
  59. question finally arrived: "what the hell have you been doing the last four years"
  60. question, er, rant from the floor
  61. I like the small buses and dial-a-bus ideas
  62. Panciuk: need to find a way to expand bus services, smaller buses, dial-a-bus, drivers have been without contracts for extended period
  63. as part of taxes
  64. Ellis: adding blackberry/mobile technology to allow users to see routs, scheds - is publicly funded - Thurlow doesn't pay for services
  65. Harrington: can't please everyone
  66. Harrington: variety of issues to be addressed, such as access for mothers with strollers - system needs to be re-evaluated
  67. Longhurst: smaller buses, and then... back to Longhurstland - an interesting place!
  68. Question from the field: what are your plans to fix public transit?
  69. Longhurst: comparing city streets to the 7th or downtown foxboro - Belleville's fault - like the roads weren't bad out there before
  70. Panciuk: no one is happy w state of roads - and back to taxation/spending message. "what could we do if we won the lottery..." ho-hum...
  71. question: how much of a priority are roads and 'inefficient' traffic light system?
  72. Ellis: takes offence at statements about lack of care - commends staff person responsible for cleaning up. He's right - it's not 'dirty'
  73. Panciuk: rezone downtown core to prevent drug sites, bring new event(s). Wi-Fi downtown. "I'm the only candidate [with a plan for downtown]
  74. and neither does he #Longhurst
  75. Longhurst: no idea what he was talking about
  76. Longhurst on downtown: could start a bed and breakfast.
  77. Ellis: needed 2/3 to allow speakers to be on agenda - "I supported, but others blocked it"
  78. Online question regarding Randy Brown and issues on the 8th of Thurlow (Zion Road)
  79. Panciuk is on message - "didn't read ire plan because I didn't want to prejudice [his views]" then back to taxation and spending
  80. Panciuk: has issue with additional capital spending - can't proceed unless there is additional stimulus spending/cost sharing
  81. BPFFA Sean Allair - what is Panciuk's view of the fire plan?
  82. Panciuk: roll back council pay increases , rezone downtown corridor to prevent meth clinic or needle exchange, "balance spending & needs"
  83. Longhurst: "will reform council", wants to see a full drug rehab clinic, and develop camping and rec facilities in the north city
  84. Having a hard time blogging and tweeting
  85. Harrington's second third thing: improving emergency services, including building one emergency services hq building for fire and police
  86. Harrington: would work to change electoral system to provide fairer representation. Wants to bring back ward system. Clean up downtown.
  87. Ellis: improved emergency facilities
  88. Question: what three things would candidate change first if elected mayor.
  89. For Panciuk, go to his site: mitchpanciuk.ca
  90. Longhurst, the amazing disappearing candidate, has spoken: to much money for downtown, need more development in Thurlow, Neil Ellis bad.
  91. Harrington prefers to move on to the questions, and declined to comment
  92. Ellis gave a good intro - looking back at where we were versus progress made to date.
  93. Introducing candidates now - from left - Ellis, Harrington, Longhurst, Panciuk - will be speaking intros in that order
  94. Just going through the introductions now. Debate can be heard live on 91.3 fm and also online.

also check out @intell and @billglisky

twitter!

for more, see me on twitter @jamesphieffer

Panciuk

Panciuk begins with his message - we can do better. Continues along this them.  Taxes are too high, and spending too high.  Very much on message, as per previous debates and public appearances.  Directs to www.mitchpanciuk.ca  More focus on future plans and candidate honesty.