Showing posts with label Belleville. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Belleville. Show all posts

Monday, 2 May 2011

Election Results for Prince Edward Hastings

Here are the results for the 41st General Election in the Riding of Prince Edward - Hastings:


Preliminary Results
Prince Edward--HastingsLast updated: 00:42 ET
PartyCandidateVotes% Votes 
IndependentTim Hickey2840.50.5%
ConservativeDaryl Kramp29,01853.253.2%
Green PartyPatrick Larkin1,8973.53.5%
NDP-New Democratic PartyMichael McMahon12,89123.723.7%
PC PartyAndrew Skinner1700.30.3%
LiberalPeter Tinsley10,23718.818.8%
Total number of valid votes: 54,497  
Polls reporting: 246/246Voter turnout: 54,497 of 88,159 registered electors (61.8%)
The number of registered electors shown in this table does not include electors who registered on election day.

Monday, 18 April 2011

Kramp Relaxed, Educational McMahon, and Tinsley Bumps Into a Door

Monday night saw the six candidates for Prince Edward – Hastings coming together for an all-candidates meeting at downtown Belleville's Empire Theatre. Hosted by the Belleville Chamber of Commerce, and with Quinte Broadcasting's Jody Brooker handling moderator duties, this was the first, and maybe last, opportunity for voters to see all of the candidates for the May 2 vote together answering questions from the Chamber and the audience.

While I had an opportunity to talk to all the candidates except the Green Party's, my in depth coverage will come in the next few days. For now, here's my quick rating of each of the candidate's performances.

In alphabetical order:

Tim Hickey:
The lone independent candidate, Hickey was handicapped at times by questions which focused on national issues and what the party platforms were. When facing these questions, he spoke of his vision for Canada which, while entirely lacking specifics (he promised these would come later this week), was presented in a folksy manner which was appealing enough. Reality is, though, in the current electoral era, an independent is virtual roadkill unless they present themselves as aligned with one of the major parties ideologically. Bonus points for not jumping on the anti-Kramp express.
Grade: C+ Performed as well as expected with material available, but needs to make clear what his political ideas are.

Daryl Kramp:
The primary target of four of the other five candidates, the current Member of Parliament for Prince Edward – Hastings was hit by anti-Conservative rhetoric from the others. He was also the target of an unreasonable (my words) amount of heckling and catcalling from a part of the audience theatre audience. In the face of this, he was measured and clear in his responses, answering questions clearly, and ignoring the voices from the peanut gallery. He was clearly familiar with the Conservative platform, but also demonstrated a strong knowledge of his parliamentary bailiwick, answering with specific figures a question on changes in the trade balance between Canada and China. He also maintained a relaxed presence throughout.
Grade: A

Patrick Larkin:
The candidate for the Green Party came across as anything but a wild-eyed tree-hugger. Impeccably dressed, he was calm and professional throughout, and skirted most of the anti-Harper rhetoric. A revelation, and, aside from his party affiliation, a legitimate contender. The Greens should consider him when Lizzy May is given the boot after losing this election.
Grade: A-

Michael McMahon
The NDP candidate was clear and concise, coming across as the teacher he is while constructing a clear argument the sensibility of the NDP platform. That didn't fly, at least from the author's viewpoint, but he put himself forward as a serious candidate - until he neglected to rebut the Liberal candidate's blanket dismissal of the legitimacy of the other candidates as challengers to the Conservatives. Instead, he continued to attack the Conservatives, leaving the Liberal challenge uncontested. He did have the line of the night, though, when in response to a question about allowing voting on post-secondary campuses, he responded strongly in the affirmative, saying, "They wouldn't let their grandparents choose their dates. At least, they shouldn't”.
Grade: B

Andrew Skinner
The candidate for the Progressive Canadian Party happily tossed about ideas and suggestions which demonstrated the party is potentially as left-wing as the NDP, but without the maturity of thought and pro-American tendencies, and that he sees those who are of a more conservative bent as un-Canadian. He had rendered himself irrelevant by the end of his opening comments. But well spoken. A little experience might help tone down some of his hyperbole.
Grade: D

Peter Tinsley
When I read the campaign literature of Peter Tinsley, he came across as a strong candidate for the Liberals – even spoken of as a “star” candidate by some. Well, what a letdown. A shaky opening was lifted up slightly by a strong answer to a question about parliamentary coalitions – but with his complete dismissal of the other challengers to Daryl Kramp he ended a very weak evening. Strong on hyperbole, weak on the facts (making numerous factual mistakes) he was a complete disappointment. The clear loser of this debate.
Grade: F

Sunday, 10 April 2011

Sand in the Shorts: Elections - Such a Hardship

This column appeared in the April 2nd, 2011 Intelligencer


So another election is upon us. While I know some are bothered by that, and much is made by the media of the idea that that this is some sort of massive imposition on Canadians, I enjoy them. As a longtime policy wonk and political junky, this is my idea of March Madness.

And is it really such an imposition after all. How will it impact you?

  • Candidates and party leaders will come to town and give speeches, shake hands, and generally work to convince you they are just like you, care about you, and will share your views when you elect them to parliament.
    • Impact on you: Only if they come to where you work, or you choose to go and see them. As these are usually publicised in advance, it is really quite easy to avoid such an event unless it is in your workplace. If it’s in your workplace, and you don’t like the visitor’s party, why not try to make rabbit ears behind them while they pretend they actually enjoy being there for the cameras. Could be funny. Could get you fired - as it should if you do it to my candidate.
  • When you turn on the news, you will see (or hear, on the radio) stories about people trying to bribe you with your own money, in touching and heartfelt ways. Stories about Libya and Japan will be pushed back (and CFTO News won’t be able to devote half of a one hour newscast to a transformer fire!). If you ignore the possibility of national bankruptcy as a result of an NDP-Liberal-Bloc coalition, that means the first 5 minutes of your news will be much less depressing.
    • Impact on you: If you want to get right to Libya and Japan, I’d like to introduce you to CNN and the Beeb (that’s the BBC - not Justin Bieber, in case there was some confusion - Bieber would be ‘the Bieb’, after all). And don’t forget the entertainment possibilities, such as “take a drink every time you see Jack Layton’s moustache”, pools on the colour of Steven Harper’s sweater in his next ad, or a race to be the first to document Michael Ignatieff’s flip-flop of the day (full documentation of the original statement required, with bonus points if you can find more than one about face in the same speech)
  • You will be exposed to political advertising (see above about being bribed with your own money).
    • Impact on you: This will end as soon as you:
      • Mute the TV
      • turn down the radio
      • turn the page of the newspaper
  • You will have to read smart-assed columns by writers who are of the opinion they are the ones who truly get it.
    • Impact on you: None, as soon as you turn the page. Which of course won’t be necessary in the case of this column.
  • You really should vote. You don’t have to, but you should. Don’t use the ‘I don’t like any of them’ excuse. That’s irrelevant - choose the one you least dislike. Don’t say it doesn’t matter. Your vote could put a candidate over the top. And if you want to make a statement about your disgust, move your lazy carcass to the polling station and spoil your ballot properly.

And if you can’t be bothered to go to your polling place to make your mark on a ballot, don’t irritate those of us who cared enough about our great country to do so by sharing your clearly under-educated and irrelevant opinion. IF YOU DON’T VOTE, I DON’T CARE! (about your opinions)

So, if you will excuse me, there’s an election going on.

Wednesday, 27 October 2010

Hello, World!

Seems I've developed a small following in the United Arab Emirates and Guadeloupe.  So I would like to say 'Hi' to them, as well as readers in the United States, South Africa, Russia, South Korea and Italy.  It's interesting to think of what would lead someone in these fa-flung locals to my blog - but it's all good!  I hope I keep you informed and entertained, and encourage you to comment as you see fit.

Saturday, 23 October 2010

Fall in Belleville

It was fun, yesterday morning, to see Belleville trending on Twitter.  How it started was likely tied to the Russ Williams case, but a number of us on decided to move things in a different direction, posting a large number of tweets about the great place that our city is.  Whether it's our small town attitude, big city amenities, proximity to cottage country...  Anyone following us got a real sense of what a great city Belleville is, from the parks and fishing spots along the Bay of Quinte and Moira River, to our historic downtown, the shopper's mecca along Bell Boulevard, to the fiery fall colourings of the rolling hills and farmland of the city's north.

Now, after lunch at Slapshot Bar and Grill (great food!), I am in Starbucks, waiting for my wife to get her hair done across the street.  And I see more of what is great in Belleville - it's people.  From kids and teens, through a young mother and her little girl, to folks my own age (40-ish), and older.  Sitting, shooting the breeze - sometimes talking to people you don't know as you wait in line.  We all have a common denominator - being here in what I think of as the best place to live in the world.

Okay - enough mushy stuff...

This 'n' that...

  • Have you gone for a fall drive yet?  Tree colours have peaked in the area, so this may be your last, best chance to enjoy a drive through Belleville's beautiful countryside.
  • Looks like my Oilers may have already peaked - three losses in a row after a two and oh start.  Oh well, it's a rebuilding year.  And unlike the Leafs, the Oilers have their picks for the upcoming draft, so a bad record isn't so bad.
  • The Prime Minister is in town Monday morning to unveil a new coin.  The public is welcome.  I'll post the info ASAP.
  • And don't forget to vote!

Friday, 22 October 2010

A Coward (But NOT a Complete Idiot) Speaks (Caution: Attempted Humour Zone)

Yes, I admit it.  I almost endorsed some candidates Wednesday.  Then my brain returned from whatever alternate dimension it had been exploring and hit me upside the head with a two-by-four.  There are only two good reasons for endorsing someone else when in my position:


  1. Not being in my position.
  2. Sudden, severe brain trauma.^
  3. A large amount of cash in an unmarked envelope*
These don't apply for the following reasons:


  1. I am in my position.
  2. No brain trauma recently.^
  3. No cash*
So, don't expect any endorsements coming from this candidate until after the election.  I will then endorse the winners (hopefully including myself, of course).

* - do you REALLY think I was serious here?  Come on... Speaking of serious brain trauma^...
^ - no disrespect meant to the serious matter of brain injuries - only trying to use humour aimed at those of us who only wish we had a brain to be traumatized.

Wednesday, 20 October 2010

The Finish Line is in Sight

After a surprisingly short, although at times it seemed so long, campaign, we are finally in the home stretch.  Already the internet and advance polling is finished - with over 4,000 people voting before anyone got to see the non-mayoralty candidates present themselves for consideration Monday night.

But ultimately, what's past is done.  The mistakes of a campaign cannot be undone - all we as candidates can do is finish up and prepare for the election stress of Monday the 25th of October.

What would I have done differently?  I would have been going door to door more and earlier.  Sorry if I missed you - please feel free to call me if you want to discuss something.  I procrastinated because, as an introvert, that is seemed like a difficult job.  And it was - going door to door is hard, time consuming work.  My hat is off to those who did more in this area than I did - kudos rightly go to you.

I would have brought together a team in January, rather than September.  While I spent a lot of time before I declared going over my platform (the university idea goes back a ways - just ask Kevin), next time I will put as much into pulling together my team and logistics plans early in the year.  That qualifies as a stupid mistake, as a veteran of a number of provincial and federal campaigns, from grunt work to campaign manager, going back to 1985.

And, as part of that, I would have put more energy into raising campaign funds.  While it would be nice to believe it's just about the ideas, if you want enough people to know about your ideas, you have to spend money advertising.

And, according to Lorne Brooker, noted political thinker, I needed a suit.  I guess that way I can blend in with the crowd.  I, though, happen to be partial to the dress code of the regular guide.  Indeed, Lorne - do you wear a suit to work every day?  I am, however, in the market for a new tweed jacket - I miss the one I had in university.

But before I go, let me commend my fellow candidates for Councillor.  There are no candidates for either position I could not vote for.  I commend my fellow council candidates for their campaigns, and acknowledge them all as the type of quality persons this city benefits from having.  Almost as good as me!

Friday, 15 October 2010

A Disgusting Way to Destroy Your Own Campaign

Last night I had the, for lack of a better way to phrase it, interesting experience of going to my first Wharf Street Debating Club Bun Feed, a Belleville tradition dating back to... Anyway, it goes back a long way - about a century.

This is supposed to be, more than an all-candidates meeting, a fun event and roast of the candidates for this years city elections.  As can be seen in the Intelligencer article, much fun was had by most, at any rate, with heckles, cat calls and wisecracks flying back and forth through the home of the Wharf Street rival, the Belleville Club, where the event was held.

My turn came to speak, and I laid an egg - and was roundly heckled for it.  Tried to be funny and failed.  I have never been the 'class clown', and demonstrated why last night.  It takes a deft touch to be a true humourist.  There weren't any in the room last night, but veteran speakers such as Mary-Anne Sills, George Zegouras and Ross MacDougall did a pretty good job, as did the Masters of Ceremonies from the WSDC, whose names I forget - and will continue to forget until I get over having the bell rung on me.

We all had a drink or two in us (not too much for me - I didn't want to make an ass of myself while drunk, so instead I made a fool of myself sober.

The last speakers of the night were the mayoralty candidates, and the last of these was Mitch Panciuk.

Now, Mitch is a guy I have generally liked, insofar as I have gotten to know him over the last month and a half.  He owns the Belleville Boston Pizza, a great family restaurant as well as a great place to watch a game.  He's an Edmonton Oilers fan, generally a good sign.

But for the most part, he has been partly tone deaf when it comes to the Belleville electorate.

He has heard the grumbling and complaining of our ever growing municipal taxes.  This is a story that likely goes back to the incorporation of Belleville as a police village back in 1836, and surely predates Belleville becoming a city in 1878.  So to assume that the taxation concerns heard these days represent the fuel to drive his campaign to victory is a dubious proposition at best. Victory would need more.

Early on, when pressed for answers on what he stood for , or what his plans and priorities would be if elected(by me and others), his response was that his priorities would be whatever the people of Belleville thought they should be.  That was it.  I was a little surprised, as he was essentially asking the electorate for a blank cheque beyond cancelling capital investments.

Then, on Tuesday, at the mayoralty debate hosted by Loyalist College, he was asked twice, by the president and then the vice president of the Belleville Professional Fire Fighters Association, if he had read the Master Fire Plan.  His response was that he hadn't as he wanted to approach fire issues with an 'open mind'. This is a document which, amongst other things, will affect the costs of taxation and fire insurance throughout the city, and his reason for not reading it is nonsensical. If he just hasn't had time to read it, admit it. A mayor has to hit the ground running, and either knowing the fire plan or listening to the guys trying to implement it is a necessity.

And then he wonders at the BPFFA supporting Neil Ellis?

But those were just the vagaries of the campaign trail, smaller details in the painting of what will be the 2010 Belleville Election.

And last night Mitch Panciuk urinated in the paint can.

His was the last podium appearance, and I can only assume he wanted to finish the night with a bang.  Which he did. In the midst of a derogatory commentary aimed at Ellis (and a shot at the Intelligencer)(very much an appropriate part of the evening, as I understand it - correct me if I'm wrong, please), he made reference to a crude 'nickname' allegedly from Ellis' high school years, and suggested, basically, that the Mayor enjoyed self-pleasuring, and was doing so currently, and as such the rest of us at the event ought not shake Ellis' hand.

I have worked in the political arena for many elections, federal and provincial, since 1985, and this is, far and away the most disgusting comment  I have ever witnessed.

I am, as most people know, a conservative (voted Reform in '93, '97, Canadian Alliance in 2000, and Conservative since at the federal level), with a libertarian streak a mile wide. And I want to make something clear - as a conservative, I deplore the unjustifiable, vulgar, reprehensible - you get the idea - comments made by Mitch Panciuk last night.  They were disgusting, have no place in an election, and have taken Belleville politics to a level I don't remember seeing before.

Mitch Panciuk owes Neil Ellis a public apology.  Otherwise, I don't see how he can be seen as a credible candidate to represent our city as mayor.

Note:  Going home last night, I asked my co-campaign chair, and good buddy, Kevin MacPhee if he could remember another candidate for public office committing political hari-kari in quite the same way.  He thought of one - Joe Biden kicking off his run for the Democratic presidential nomination by commenting on how clean and well spoken Barak Obama was - for a young black man.  Fortunately for Biden, Obama didn't hold a grudge.

Tuesday, 12 October 2010

My Twitter Coverage of the Mayoralty Candidates debate - Oct 12, 2010, from Loyalist College

  1. any questions - thanks for following tonight
  2. Such excitement - blow after blow - or not - but the Longhurst follies provided entertainment. Thanks for following. Feel free to tweet
  3. Ellis slams Panciuk to close debate!
  4. Longhurst: "I paid my $200" - Thurlow gets shafted - has since amalgamation - he's off to his own personal special place
  5. Panciuk: there is a guy w/ a 'ditch mitch for mayor' shirt - 'my own personal protester' - "join me and build a better Belleville"
  6. Closing
  7. Herrington: we have a good police force - Neighbourhood watch is for communities to organize
  8. Longhurst: never really thought of it
  9. Ellis: looking at using tech to aid in Neighbourhood watch using Teksavvy
  10. Panciuk: would support that
  11. Question - in light of violence of last year, any thoughts of increasing Neighbourhood Watch
  12. Longhurst: all for it
  13. Harrington: paved shoulders and trails
  14. Ellis: working to extend pathway for cycles, walking to Loyalist from Bridge W
  15. Question: in 4 years will there be a green way to commute to Loyalist
  16. Longhurst: checked with Ellis if it's Belleville or Quinte West - Ellis said QW - but they continue to answer - Hamilton Rd is in QW!
  17. Q: will there ever be lights at Hamilton and Wallbridge-Loyalist Rd
  18. Longhurst - all for it
  19. Ellis and Panciuk support, as does Harrington
  20. Question: transit passes as part of Loyalist tuition
  21. Longhurst- I'm a union man and won't take away union jobs
  22. Harrington - supports 907 continued work
  23. Ellis tried to rebut - wasn't allowed
  24. Panciuk: supports city owned facilities but concerned about increasing costs. Just attacked Ellis! Ellis "came clean" on some monetary info
  25. Ellis: no plans for any privatization
  26. Question - will Local 907 continue to operate arenas?
  27. LLLLLLLonghurst! - "never voted for a sign in my life", etc - and he's out of there!
  28. sign business owners
  29. Harrington - city makes money off sign permits - communities need to speak up regarding signs in community - sign business just sideline for
  30. when they are just starting - mentioned Smitty's plethora of signs - people are more concerned about # of political signs
  31. Panciuk: need to distinguish between quality of signs - some are better than others - concerned about impact on businesses - especially
  32. sign business owners, will take time
  33. Ellis - signs are ugly and all over the place - how can we get rid of them in a fair way - council has had tough decisions, consider
  34. Question: concerned about signs along streets -
  35. Ellis: city funds Pinnacle Playhouse, rebuilding bandshell @ Zwicks Island, council funds Quinte Arts Council, Festival of Trees, ballet
  36. Panciuk: we have an art scene that rivals some much larger centres, can foster arts with events in the summer
  37. Harrington ; arts about more than just painters, etc - should have support from city - good from tourism
  38. Longhurst supports arts - an art gallery would cost money, but apparently we don't have any
  39. sorry, am I becoming sarcastic?
  40. Longstache, er Longhurst: will believe it when he sees it.
  41. Local entity there if Baymount can't fulfill contract
  42. Ellis - city doesn't control Ag Society, who have the contract with Baymount - new ownership of Baymount - looks to be moving forward
  43. But he is working the 'stache!
  44. Is Longhurst more like Oscar the Grouch, or Elmo?
  45. Panciuk and Ellis just co-operated - Grover would be proud!
  46. Racetrack question: -Panciuk: Baymount having extreme financial difficulty (ya think?!)
  47. Ellis is addressing the question of transit. need to teach children about transit, get them and their parents used to it - ridership up
  48. Longhurstland is open for business! I want what HE's having!
  49. IT'S LONGHURST TIME! Twice a day - audience is telling him it didn't work - where is 'downtown foxboro'? as opposed to just foxboro
  50. rain causes treatment plant to bypass - need to separate systems, so storm drains dont link to sewers - part of roads reconstruction plan
  51. Ellis: remedial action plan almost completed, Meyers Pier rehab - need to work to eliminate waste being flushed into the bay when heavy
  52. Longhurst: need to work with senior governments and conservation areas
  53. Herrington: agrees with Panciuk - need to work with other municipalities, Quinte Conservation, "need to work together"
  54. Panciuk: enforce regs - doesn't believe city is further damaging bay - a lot of what is in the bay comes from other places
  55. question: what would candidates do regarding bay of quinte
  56. Ellis: "we were handed a mess", had to give back superbuild money (5 million)
  57. most spending courtesy of transfers from senior governments
  58. Ellis: goes over what the city has done: it is handy to have accomplishments to fall back on - for better or worse
  59. question finally arrived: "what the hell have you been doing the last four years"
  60. question, er, rant from the floor
  61. I like the small buses and dial-a-bus ideas
  62. Panciuk: need to find a way to expand bus services, smaller buses, dial-a-bus, drivers have been without contracts for extended period
  63. as part of taxes
  64. Ellis: adding blackberry/mobile technology to allow users to see routs, scheds - is publicly funded - Thurlow doesn't pay for services
  65. Harrington: can't please everyone
  66. Harrington: variety of issues to be addressed, such as access for mothers with strollers - system needs to be re-evaluated
  67. Longhurst: smaller buses, and then... back to Longhurstland - an interesting place!
  68. Question from the field: what are your plans to fix public transit?
  69. Longhurst: comparing city streets to the 7th or downtown foxboro - Belleville's fault - like the roads weren't bad out there before
  70. Panciuk: no one is happy w state of roads - and back to taxation/spending message. "what could we do if we won the lottery..." ho-hum...
  71. question: how much of a priority are roads and 'inefficient' traffic light system?
  72. Ellis: takes offence at statements about lack of care - commends staff person responsible for cleaning up. He's right - it's not 'dirty'
  73. Panciuk: rezone downtown core to prevent drug sites, bring new event(s). Wi-Fi downtown. "I'm the only candidate [with a plan for downtown]
  74. and neither does he #Longhurst
  75. Longhurst: no idea what he was talking about
  76. Longhurst on downtown: could start a bed and breakfast.
  77. Ellis: needed 2/3 to allow speakers to be on agenda - "I supported, but others blocked it"
  78. Online question regarding Randy Brown and issues on the 8th of Thurlow (Zion Road)
  79. Panciuk is on message - "didn't read ire plan because I didn't want to prejudice [his views]" then back to taxation and spending
  80. Panciuk: has issue with additional capital spending - can't proceed unless there is additional stimulus spending/cost sharing
  81. BPFFA Sean Allair - what is Panciuk's view of the fire plan?
  82. Panciuk: roll back council pay increases , rezone downtown corridor to prevent meth clinic or needle exchange, "balance spending & needs"
  83. Longhurst: "will reform council", wants to see a full drug rehab clinic, and develop camping and rec facilities in the north city
  84. Having a hard time blogging and tweeting
  85. Harrington's second third thing: improving emergency services, including building one emergency services hq building for fire and police
  86. Harrington: would work to change electoral system to provide fairer representation. Wants to bring back ward system. Clean up downtown.
  87. Ellis: improved emergency facilities
  88. Question: what three things would candidate change first if elected mayor.
  89. For Panciuk, go to his site: mitchpanciuk.ca
  90. Longhurst, the amazing disappearing candidate, has spoken: to much money for downtown, need more development in Thurlow, Neil Ellis bad.
  91. Harrington prefers to move on to the questions, and declined to comment
  92. Ellis gave a good intro - looking back at where we were versus progress made to date.
  93. Introducing candidates now - from left - Ellis, Harrington, Longhurst, Panciuk - will be speaking intros in that order
  94. Just going through the introductions now. Debate can be heard live on 91.3 fm and also online.