Showing posts with label Elections Canada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Elections Canada. Show all posts

Monday, 2 May 2011

Election Results for Prince Edward Hastings

Here are the results for the 41st General Election in the Riding of Prince Edward - Hastings:


Preliminary Results
Prince Edward--HastingsLast updated: 00:42 ET
PartyCandidateVotes% Votes 
IndependentTim Hickey2840.50.5%
ConservativeDaryl Kramp29,01853.253.2%
Green PartyPatrick Larkin1,8973.53.5%
NDP-New Democratic PartyMichael McMahon12,89123.723.7%
PC PartyAndrew Skinner1700.30.3%
LiberalPeter Tinsley10,23718.818.8%
Total number of valid votes: 54,497  
Polls reporting: 246/246Voter turnout: 54,497 of 88,159 registered electors (61.8%)
The number of registered electors shown in this table does not include electors who registered on election day.

Tuesday, 26 April 2011

Kevin Libin: U.S. group crosses boundaries in urging Tory defeat | Full Comment | National Post

by Kevin Libin - from the National Post

This election may go down as the one where the Internet broke Elections Canada’s control over our electoral process. It’s already fairly certain that social media users will make hash of s. 329 of the Canada Elections Act: defiant Facebookers and Twitterers are promising to flout the ban on reporting eastern poll results early, despite the risk of fines.

But a U.S.-based Internet activist group is also shaking up traditional boundaries on the influence that foreign groups can bring to bear on Canadians’ voting intentions.

The Avaaz Foundation, a left-wing non-profit organization registered in New York and Delaware, isn’t hiding the fact that it’s crusading to defeat the Conservatives, buying ads urging Canadians to “vote strategically” in their riding to ensure “all the opposition parties together … win a huge majority of Parliament.”

And on Tuesday, the group announced it was bankrolling a lawsuit demanding the release of the Auditor General’s report into G8 spending, that might show the previous government “illegally handed 50 million taxpayer dollars to a Conservative riding and covered it up.” It’s even using Canada’s Charter of Rights to back its argument, claiming access to certain government documents are guaranteed.

Avaaz has turned up before in the midst of an election to campaign against Stephen Harper’s Conservatives. But its reappearance highlights how our elections laws seem increasingly ill-fitted to the digital era. In 2008, Avaaz registered as a third-party with Elections Canada, subletting space in Ottawa, only to decamp back to New York after the vote. It ran ads in ridings across Canada encouraging readers to vote strategically for whichever candidate stood the best chance of beating the Tory incumbent.

One target, former environment minister John Baird, called the group a “shadowy foreign organization” and complained to Elections Canada that Avaaz was demonstrating “possible” violations of restrictions on ad spending and foreign interference. Avaaz’s third-party returns did reveal some curious items: what the Tories alleged were breaches of spending limits by riding; ads bought in Halifax newspapers seemingly allocated to allowances for B.C. ridings; and while its American tax return reported US$137,724 of “political expenditures” in Canada in 2008, an Elections Canada third-party filing listed just $57,733.83. Nothing came of the complaint. Read more...

Kevin Libin: U.S. group crosses boundaries in urging Tory defeat | Full Comment | National Post

Saturday, 23 April 2011

Elections Canada’s Twitter ban shows why bureaucrats and social media don’t mix


BY KATHRYN MARSHALL - from CANADA.COM

Elections Canada has decided to take on the Twitterverse. It has announced that it will apply a law from the 1930s to prevent election results from Atlantic Canada being posted on Twitter before the polls close in the rest of the country. Elections Canada claims that it is merely enforcing the law, but it applies it so unevenly that its argument does not hold water. This is why bureaucrats shouldn’t be let anywhere near social media—their instinct is to control it.
Section 329 of the Elections Act states that “no person shall transmit the results” from one riding to another before the polls are closed. The fine for breaking this can be up to $25,000 – and Elections Canada has a history of prosecuting people under this section. After the 2000 election it raided the home of a man who had posted the early results on his website, fined him and seized his computer.
So posting results on a website is taboo, but Elections Canada says it is ok to share them by email, phone call or even a Facebook message. Still sounds like transmitting to me. But it is forbidden to post the results to your Facebook profile or on your Twitter feed. Read More

Elections Canada’s Twitter ban shows why bureaucrats and social media don’t mix